INJURY REPORT

REJECTED: Source mismatch and insufficient facts

May 18, 2026 James Harrison, Premier League Correspondent

Share r/soccer

Article Rejected

The provided source material describes contract negotiations for Graeme Shinnie and Scott Arfield, containing no information about injuries. Writing a 900-1200 word injury update based on this 15-word headline without hallucinating facts, fabricating quotes, or using vague padding would violate multiple critical anti-AI rules.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is involved in the recent contract negotiations?

According to the provided source material, Graeme Shinnie and Scott Arfield are the primary individuals involved in the current contract negotiations. The text highlights these two specific figures but does not elaborate further on the exact terms or the opposing parties involved in these discussions.

What information is provided regarding player injuries in the update?

The available source material contains absolutely no information regarding any player injuries or medical updates. Instead, the focus of the brief text is entirely centered around the ongoing contract negotiations for specific individuals, meaning any injury reports cannot be verified through this source.

Why was the proposed injury update article rejected?

The proposed article was rejected primarily due to a significant mismatch between the requested topic and the actual source material. The source lacked any relevant injury details and did not possess sufficient factual information to meet the required length constraints without resorting to artificial padding.

What issues arise from expanding a short headline?

Attempting to stretch a brief 15-word headline into a comprehensive 900-1200 word article forces a writer to violate critical content guidelines. This practice inevitably leads to hallucinating unverified facts, fabricating non-existent quotes, and relying heavily on vague padding to reach the necessary word count.

What is the main topic covered in the source material?

The primary and sole topic covered in the provided source material is the ongoing contract negotiations involving Graeme Shinnie and Scott Arfield. Despite expectations for an injury update, the text strictly discusses these contractual matters without providing any additional contextual details or medical evaluations.

#rejected