The United Legend Stirs the Pot
Wayne Rooney chiming in on Liverpool internal affairs is roughly as welcome on Merseyside as a flat tire on the M62. But here we are. In the dying days of the 2025/26 season, the former Manchester United talisman has lobbed a grenade straight into the Anfield dressing room.
According to a recent BBC report, Rooney declared that Mohamed Salah should be completely dropped from Liverpool's season finale. The reasoning? Rooney labeled Salah's recent public criticism of the club as "selfish."
Naturally, the internet has reacted with all the calm, measured nuance you would expect. Which is to say, it has been an absolute bloodbath across every forum, subreddit, and group chat dedicated to the Reds.
When a rival legend tells your manager to bench your best player, the tribal instincts kick in immediately. You can almost hear the furious typing echoing across the northwest of England. But sift through the pure rage, and a surprisingly complex civil war is brewing among the Liverpool faithful.
It is May 18th. The season is almost over. Tensions are incredibly high, and patience is wearing thin. Everyone is exhausted, and the last thing anyone wanted was an unforced error in the media from their star winger.
The Anti-Rooney Faction
For a massive chunk of the fanbase, the actual substance of Rooney's argument is entirely irrelevant. The messenger has completely invalidated the message. They do not care what Salah said, and they certainly do not care what Rooney thinks about it.
Go onto any Liverpool match thread right now and the sheer hostility toward Rooney is radiating off the screen. The overarching sentiment is simple. A Manchester United icon has absolutely zero business dictating terms to Arne Slot.
One highly upvoted post captured the mood perfectly, pointing out the pure irony of Rooney preaching about loyalty and unselfishness. Fans are quick to drag up Rooney's own messy contract disputes and transfer demands during his Old Trafford tenure.
To these supporters, Salah is untouchable. He is the Egyptian King. He dragged this team through the mud for years. He has provided moments of magic that will live forever in the club's history.
You do not bench a guy with his goal record for a farewell home game. Period. They view Rooney's comments as cheap punditry designed to unsettle the squad right before the summer window opens.
Some of the more aggressive responses point out that Rooney is just trying to stay relevant in the media cycle. By taking a swing at the biggest name at his former club's biggest rival, he guarantees himself airtime and clicks.
The Quiet Agreements in the Back Rows
But scroll down a bit further. Ignore the all-caps screaming and the endless barrage of angry emojis. You will find a completely different, much quieter contingent of fans who are wrestling with an uncomfortable truth.
They hate that it was Rooney who said it. But they kind of agree with him.
Salah's recent comments criticizing the club—whatever his grievances are regarding contracts or the summer window—left a sour taste for many. The timing was atrocious. With the season drawing to a close, dragging the front office into the public square feels entirely unnecessary.
These pragmatists are arguing that no player is bigger than the club. Slot has been trying to build a collective identity since taking over. Having your star winger airing dirty laundry in the press directly undermines that project.
They argue that benching Salah sends a necessary message. It establishes boundaries. It proves that the badge on the front matters more than the name on the back.
One user on a prominent fan forum noted that this isn't the first time Salah's camp has used the media to apply pressure. For this segment of the fanbase, the fatigue is real. They are tired of the drama and just want a squad that is fully focused on the pitch.
The Tactical Headache
Then there are the tactical nerds who are ignoring the drama and looking purely at the pitch. Dropping Salah sounds great as a disciplinary flex, but how does it actually work in reality?
We are talking about replacing a man who guarantees goal contributions. If Slot actually listens to the noise and puts Salah on the bench, the entire attacking shape shifts drastically.
Do you throw Harvey Elliott onto the right flank? Elliott has the work rate and the creative passing, but he lacks that terrifying, sheer pace that forces defenders to sit deep. He isn't going to outrun a full-back to the byline.
Or do you shift Darwin Nunez out wide and embrace total chaos? Nunez cutting inside from the right is a fascinating, terrifying concept. It might result in a hat-trick. It might result in three balls landing in the River Mersey.
The tactical forums are tearing their hair out. Some fans point out that without Salah dragging two defenders with him, the space for players like Cody Gakpo completely dries up.
You cannot just remove your primary offensive weapon and expect the machine to keep humming. Opposing managers gameplan entirely around stopping Salah. Take him out, and you make their job significantly easier.
This is where the rubber meets the road. Discipline is great in theory, but dropping points because your attack is suddenly toothless is a fast way to turn the crowd against the manager.
The Legacy Factor
There is also a deeply emotional layer to all of this. Salah is not just a player; he is a defining figure of the modern Liverpool era. He is the face of their greatest triumphs over the last decade.
For many fans, the idea of his potentially final home game of a season—or ever, depending on what happens in the summer transfer window—being spent sitting next to the backup goalkeeper in a puffer jacket is physically nauseating.
They argue about respect. You treat your legends with grace, even when they step out of line in the media. Bench him, and you risk fracturing a relationship that has defined Anfield for almost ten years.
The counter-argument floating around is that true legends do not put the manager in a position to make these choices in the first place. A real leader handles grievances behind closed doors, in the manager's office, not in front of a microphone.
The debate has evolved into a philosophical discussion about what constitutes loyalty. Does the club owe Salah unwavering support because of his past output? Or does Salah owe the club professionalism regardless of his personal frustrations?
Where Do We Go From Here?
So, who has the stronger argument? It is tough to admit, but the pragmatists are winning the logical debate, even if the loyalists are winning the emotional one.
Rooney might be the last person Liverpool fans want to hear from, but his underlying point hits a nerve. Publicly criticizing the club right before the season wraps up is a massive distraction. It forces the manager into a corner.
If Slot lets it slide, he looks weak. He looks like he is capitulating to player power. Establishing unshakeable authority is the hardest thing a manager has to do, and backing down from a star player sets a dangerous precedent for the rest of the dressing room.
However, from a purely footballing perspective, benching your best goalscorer to prove a point is a massive gamble. If Liverpool drop points in the finale because the attack looks blunt, the blame will fall squarely on the manager's shoulders, not Salah's.
The media will feast on the narrative that the manager's ego cost the team a win. It is a no-win situation for Slot.
The Inevitable Conclusion
Ultimately, the fury directed at Rooney is just a convenient shield. It is infinitely easier for fans to scream at a United legend than to process the very real friction between their star player and the club they love.
Salah has earned plenty of goodwill. He has built a mountain of credit in the bank. But the reality is that the bank is calling, and the interest rates are getting steeper by the minute.
My guess? Slot starts him. You do not blow up the squad harmony right at the finish line just to flex your managerial muscles. The points are too important, and the backlash of benching him is too severe.
But the fact that we are even having this conversation—that a massive segment of the fanbase is actively debating whether to bench Mohamed Salah—shows just how strained things have become behind the scenes.
"Mohamed Salah should be dropped from Liverpool's season finale for 'selfish' criticism of Liverpool."
Rooney knew exactly what he was doing when he delivered that line to the media. He tossed a lit match into a room entirely full of gasoline.
Right now, the entire Liverpool fanbase is arguing loudly about who should be the one to put out the fire. And honestly, watching the chaos unfold is the most entertaining part of the week.
Read Next